🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a latest court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the latest turn in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the authority and justification to deploy state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to evade the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”